[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: predictions



I don't know his intentions, only his words.  He's been quoted in the Boston
papers that he wasn't going to play Antoine and Paul 40 minutes per game
this season because they were worn out for the playoffs.

Not too many ways to spin that, Tammo.  Then again, some folks believe that
a lb of feathers weighs more than a lb of lead.  Guess I'll just have to
"get over it", right?

Or is it just another one of JB's "bad days"?

----- Original Message -----
From: <Tammo29@AOL.com>
To: <celtics@igtc.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: predictions


> "In other words, he could be right on, but in the spirit of good schizo
> journalism, I'm prompted to be the devil's advocate and grant a rational,
to
> those who might not have one, meaning in this case, Jimmy O'Brien, who
> already said, in yesterday's paper that he wouldn't continue to play
Walker
> and Pierce 40 minutes a game and then went right ahead and did it anyway,
> against the Wizards."
>
>                                                   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>   I could be wrong but I read O'Brien's words differently.  I understood
him
> to say he would play Walker and Pierce in shorter stretches, taking them
out
> sooner and more often for short breathers, not that he would play them
less
> minutes.
> I think it was always his intention to play them 40 minutes.