Re: Besides Jim O'Brien

["Lance Jacobson" <lancejacob@xxxxxxxxx>]

OK, well, let's spend the rest of November figuring out which player on
which teams need to be "removed" so that we can face EXACTLY the same amount
of dimunition on each team we face.

Will that be a fun project, Cecil?

The Lakers are the most powerful team--remove Shaq, Fox and play them in
Boston and the Celts won.

Go to Minn, play the sloppy, point-guardless Wolves without Wally and we
have a good chance.

Play Utah in Boston without Dorian Gray and we have a chance.

OK, we've won five straight and we face a solid Sixers team.  We may win,
but the party's over.  And the cops arrive on Friday with Mavs uniforms on.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cecil" <cecil@hfx.eastlink.ca>
To: <celtics@igtc.com>
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: Besides Jim O'Brien


> I think a comparison of Shaq to Pierce regarding the relative importance
to
> their respective teams may be appropriate.  Not so in the case of Wally.
>
> Cecil
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Eggcentric@AOL.com>
> To: <celtics@igtc.com>
> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 3:12 PM
> Subject: Re: Besides Jim O'Brien
>
>
> > < Right on. Let's rid ourselves of this attitude *they had key player(s)
> >
> > missing* So what. It's not a perfect world. A win is a win no matter
what.
> >
> > Can anyone tell for sure these teams would have fared better?? >
> >
> >     - dforant
> >
> > No, no one can tell for sure, still I feel in my bones that had the
Lakers
> > had Shaq and had the TWolves had Wally, we just might have lost
> > those games.
> >
> > Try and envision this:  The Celtics without PP.
> >
> > Nuff said.
> >
> > Egg