RE: Tonight's game

["Orion" <jlyell@netzero.net>]

IMO, Kedrick has shown little more than great athleticism this year. He is
not confident from the outside any more than Joe Johnson was. I guarantee
you he would not have hit, or probably even taken, the shots Strickland took
and we would have likely given it away.

I can't even recall seeing Forte play one minute this year

Hey I 'm as much a devils advocate, and we are a long way from being in the
top teams,  but it is good to get to the 40 win plateau.


With a few key games from the likes or Rogers, Delk, Strickland, who knows
what could happen.

Wasn't Rogers with Denver when they were an #8 team knocking of Seattle a
#1?











 -----Original Message-----
From: 	owner-celtics@igtc.com [mailto:owner-celtics@igtc.com]  On Behalf Of
Shawn Niles
Sent:	Monday, March 25, 2002 7:45 PM
To:	birdwl@earthlink.net; Celtics@igtc.com
Subject:	Re: Tonight's game

I know that complaining after a win is not popular, but I am looking long
term. Putting Kedrick in could have caused this game to not be so close at
the end. Even in wins, things can be done better.


>From: bird <birdwl@earthlink.net>
>To: Celtics@igtc.com
>Subject: Re: Tonight's game
>Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 19:39:10 -0800
>
>>From: "Shawn Niles" <shizzjr@hotmail.com>
>>
>>Also, in a game like tonights, where you are searching for any type of
>>energy, why does Kedrick not get off the bench? Tonight seemed like the
>>perfect game to put him in and try and cause a spark.
>
>Um, Shawn ... they won, didn't they?  Perfect opportunity or not, he didn'
>t get in and the team won.  Good enough for me.
>
>>Don't get me wrong... I'm thrilled they won. But this was a thoroughly
>>frustrating game to watch.
>
>I'm a simple man.  Lose = frustrated.  Win = not frustrated.  Life is good
>until the next game.
>
>Bird