Fwd: [Celtics' Stuff Tony, what have you done for us lately?

[Celtic4Hire@AOL.com]

Return-Path: <sentto-4029719-5405-1016584428-Celtic4Hire=aol.com@returns
  .groups.yahoo.com>
Received: from  rly-xa04.mx.aol.com (rly-xa04.mail.aol.com
  [172.20.105.73]) by air-xa04.mail.aol.com (v83.45) with ESMTP id
  MAILINXA43-0319201424; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 20:14:24 -0500
Received: from  n2.grp.scd.yahoo.com (n2.grp.scd.yahoo.com
  [66.218.66.75]) by rly-xa04.mx.aol.com (v83.45) with ESMTP id
  MAILRELAYINXA43-0319201410; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 20:14:10 -0500
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-4029719-5405-1016584428-Celtic4Hire=aol.com@ret
  urns.groups.yahoo.com
Received: from [66.218.67.200] by n2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20
  Mar 2002 00:33:49 -0000
X-Sender: Celtic4Hire@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: Celticsstuffgroup@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: unknown); 20 Mar 2002 00:33:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 51427 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2002 00:20:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with
  QMQP; 20 Mar 2002 00:20:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m02.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.5) by
  mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Mar 2002 00:20:52 -0000
Received: from Celtic4Hire@aol.com by imo-m02.mx.aol.com
  (mail_out_v32.5.) id 7.179.5551fb2 (16633) for
  <Celticsstuffgroup@yahoogroups.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 19:20:50 -0500
  (EST)
Message-ID: <179.5551fb2.29c92fe1@aol.com>
To: Celticsstuffgroup@yahoogroups.com
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 113
From: Celtic4Hire@aol.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: list Celticsstuffgroup@yahoogroups.com; contact
  Celticsstuffgroup-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list Celticsstuffgroup@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:Celticsstuffgroup-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 19:20:49 EST
Subject: [Celtics' Stuff Tony, what have you done for us lately?
Reply-To: Celticsstuffgroup@yahoogroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I am starting to get onboard with this Vitally over Battie thing. 
Offensively, I think they balance out. Earlier in the season, you could count 
on Battie slams or Vitaly jumpers. Now, you can't count on either of them for 
that. But Vitally is able to box out much more effectively; half of the 
battle is keeping the opposing center from getting the rebound. The other 
factor is that Vitally is able to use his body on possible mismatches under 
the basket when the C's are spread out. We saw that when Battie was out and 
haven't seen it since. Actually, even though they both suck, it would make a 
difference. All it would have taken in either the Spur or Blazer loss was ONE 
offensive rebound in the crunch. Vitally did that twice for us in the streak, 
allbeit in inferior competition. Battie has done that for us also in the past 
but "Tony, what have you done for us lately?"....

DJessen33

<Look, they both stink. I know that. But Vitaly was playing some of his best
basketball during the winning streak. He was playing hard and making a real
impact on the boards. He was playing better than Battie has for any extended
stretch this season. I just think he deserves better than to be relegated to
Kedrick-like status because El Busto is back. 

Do either of them make a huge difference? No.>

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
<FONT COLOR="#000099">Access Your PC from Anywhere
Check Email & Transfer files - Free Download
</FONT><A HREF="http://us.click.yahoo.com/omECdA/3XkDAA/DIxGAA/hJUolB/TM"><B>Click Here!</B></A>
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Celticsstuffgroup-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/