Re: PG for the last spot?

["Shawn Niles" <shizzjr@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

The team is better off without Strickland. For every game he helped them 
win, there were 3 games that he lost for them. I have never seen a player 
take more ill-advised shots than him. He never seemed to grasp that he was 
not the number 1 option on the team. Most people were blinded by this 
because of the charges that he would take. A charge is one of the more 
exciting plays to see in a basketball game, especially if it comes when the 
other team is making a run. Because of this, most fans could not see the 
downside of Strickland, which was large. He is not a very smart basketball 
player. He shot the ball way too much. Numerous times he would kill a run 
the team was trying to make by bringing the ball up himself and jacking up a 
shot immediately. Good riddance to him.



> From: "Dorine Pratt" <norine@pshift.com>
> To: "Jaims" <jaims@info.com.ph>, "Celtics" <celtics@igtc.com>
> Subject: Re: PG for the last spot?
> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 22:28:39 -0500
>
> I'd vote for Strick, too - he's a real team player and will be sadly missed
> by us all.
>
> Dorine
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jaims" <jaims@info.com.ph>
> To: "Celtics" <celtics@igtc.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 9:20 PM
> Subject: PG for the last spot?
>
>
> If i were to choose from Ray's list of available PGs, I'd say my choice
> would
> be one of these players: Erick Strickland, Chris Childs or Greg Anthony.
>
> These PGs are tough defenders and of course, shoot the 3 well.  But I'd 
> like
> Erick Strick to return as we've already seen what he can contribute and 
> that
> he fits well with our team.
>
> Jaims



_________________________________________________________________
Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com