Re: look at it this way

["John Lyell" <johnlyell@hotmail.com>]

It is interesting we have heard everyone from Brown, Radmanovich, Murphy,
Bradley Cook , Hassell, Hunter all being possible top 10 when they are more
like 15-25. I smell some good propaganda on the part of some agents!

I still don't see why we would  be so enamored in Gasol. Do we really need
to move 2 picks for another perimeter scorer? With the rules changes maybe
so, but wouldn't a Radmanovich and Jefferson make us a better all around
team than Gasol alone?








----- Original Message -----
From: "Gene Kirkpatrick" <gkir@tjc.tyler.cc.tx.us>
To: <celtics@igtc.com>
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 6:54 AM
Subject: look at it this way


> you would feel worse about Kendrick Brown if you had ever seen the
> campus of Okaloosa-Walton JC.  Of course, I drove though a week after
> a hurricane a few years back.  But, just look at the possibles in the
> second ten.  Mostly stiffs or hopefuls or incomplete games with a few
> jewels (Richard Jefferson, for instance) in the mix.  I mean:  Murphy,
> Bradley, Randolph, Woods, Forte, etc.  So, if Brown has it all and the
> question is "can he take that game to the NBA level?" then, I wouldn't
> mind trying him.  It looks like he's got the game.
>
> Still, I don't see why he wouldn't be available at 21.  Unless
> Wallace has some inside dope that he's moved up considerably, then I
> would wait on him, just as I would wait on Gasol at 10.  But recent
> news on Gasol looks like he will be gone.  Could we be trading up for
> Pau and then taking Brown at #11?  My only concern is that it's hard
> to upgrade at #1 and #5 positions.  Are we missing a chance to
> solidify even one of those spots?  Come on, Chris.  Don't let us
> down.
>
> Gene   (I'm calm, I'm cool.)
>
>