[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Antoine's game vs. Minnesota



I disagree with Joe and everybody else about Antoine.  First of all, re the
Bird comparison, Bird always, always kept shooting from everywhere on the
court when he was in a slump.  All shooters shoot themselves out of slumps.
Second of all, Antoine knows that he has to shoot a lot for the team to be
successful.   Some of those shots in retrospect would have been better
distributed to Stith, Williams, etc.  But Antoine is one of our two scoring
threats, and he has to keep at it. 

Bottom line:   I don't think any player needs defending when he gets 20, 12,
and 12 in a win.

Josh Ozersky	
Marketing Communications Specialist 
Corning Museum of Glass

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Hironaka [SMTP:j.hironaka@unesco.org]
> Sent:	Tuesday, January 16, 2001 11:29 AM
> To:	Sampath, Venkatesh; celtics@igtc.com
> Subject:	Re: Antoine's game vs. Minnesota
> 
> "Sampath, Venkatesh" wrote:
> 
> > Certainly hope so. However, I wouldn't be surprised to see him fade away
> a little over the next couple of games - specially against Sacramento.
> 
> It could go either way, but at least Walker seems to acknowledge that his
> game is off. In today's Herald, he tells Bulpett:
> 
> ``The two days off really hurt me,'' Walker said. ``I had a lot of balls
> go in and out. I didn't have the bounce in my legs that I've been having.
> Hopefully with a good practice (today), I'll get my legs back and won't
> shoot this bad against Sacramento (tomorrow).''
> 
> It is worth noting that while Antoine is hardly a 2001 All Star or has
> much trade value, he does rank all alone in second place in triple doubles
> with three, which among other things is more than Garnett, Odom and Webber
> combined (two). He's also done it against non-pushover opponents in
> Charlotte, Indy and Minnesota. Last night was his second 12 assist game
> this season.
> 
> On the other hand, while I can recall bad shooting nights for Larry Bird I
> can't remember any 6-26 games where he follows a 1-11 first half by
> actually going out and taking even more attempts (15) in the second. This
> didn't even happen when Bird was the same age as Walker as a rookie.
> 
> I love Walker still but I'm confounded by how his obvious intelligence
> still leaves such room for gaping flaws and fugliness in his game. Doesn't
> he know when to quit when he's 1-8 on three pointers? Can't he think of a
> new approach to driving at the basket, after repeatedly getting his shot
> slammed back in the face before it even leaves his fingertips? This is one
> area where I just don't see any light at the end of the tunnel, despite
> his young age.
> 
> ------------
> 
> Jim O'Brien's first four opponents have very quietly been contained to
> .431 shooting (128-297) since the hollering stopped on the sidelines and
> the chicken outbreak got simplified. Although O'Brien is in a hopeless
> situation with the worst part of the schedule lying ahead, the exciting
> thing so far is that the past four opponents are all above .500. In fact
> they were a combined 27 games over .500 and feature marquee, unstoppable
> players like Vince Carter, Kevin Garnett, Rasheed Wallace
> etc. while the Celts have had two starters out and a very thin bench. Next
> up, Sacramento. Yikes! Pierce and Walker could each pitch a perfect game
> and we still might end up losing. That's basically what happened once
> against Indiana I think when Pierce had 29 and Walker had a triple.
> 
> 
>