[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Expect Loss in Charlotte
> From: JB <jbmetzea@yahoo.com>
>
> There are those that are optimistic, some that are
> pessimistic and then there is myself, who is wildly manic. Every year, I
> predict 53 wins and rejoice in the good play and tear my hair out when
> they
> go selfish and lazy.
> We are here, we are fans. There are not "good" fans and by contrast
> bad
> fans.
Yeah, actually, I don't think you could be more wrong. Or perhaps it's
more accurate to say that there are fans on this list who are sometimes
good and sometimes bad (hey, sometimes I'm late running to watch the game,
or I actually listen to my wife while there are *important* things
happening on the court -- these are indicative of a Bad Fan (tm)), and
then there are people here who are not fans. Yes, I'm looking in your
direction Way/Ray/Kai/Mr. Ghost/etc. There are others, but I think people
who are interested in what I think (all two of you ...) already can guess
at who else I might mention. Doesn't matter, anyway. Just my opinion.
For the record, it's not a matter of being "pessimistic" or "optimistic".
I don't think fans need to always provide the sunniest perspective on the
team. Be critical. Maybe they could refrain from posting messages
(grammatically) commanding people to "expect a loss", though? IMO, that
just sucks.
Bird
P.S. By the way, JB, you don't seem "manic" so much as
"manic-depressive" -- when things are good, they're really good, and when
they're bad, they are really bad. And that's OK. (You're good enough,
strong enough, and doggone it ...). Being a fan can liberate one inasmuch
as allowing behavior that isn't desirable in serious, adult, life. Like,
being so rabidly prejudiced against another group (like say, the Fakers)
is a Bad Thing in real life. Conversely, I believe it's the fourth
commandment in our little religion here ("Thou shalt not give the Lakers a
break"). Anyway, I don't need to point out the behavior of the
aforementioned troll that provides the opposite example, do I? No, I didn'
t think so.