RE: Haywood/Montross

["James A. Hill" <jahill@leasingservice.com>]

Can't say I disagree with your picks.  I liked JJ and Murphy and was amazed
to see the two PG's available in the 20's.  I don't know if it was
"possible" to package picks and move up but I would have considered that.  I
also wasn't convinced to use the Denver pick this past draft anyway.  But I
don't watch enough college ball to have real input on that.  I mostly just
look into the guy's the list seems hot for.
<Jim

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Jim Hill
mailto:jahill@leasingservice.com


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-celtics-digest@igtc.com
[mailto:owner-celtics-digest@igtc.com]On Behalf Of Colin Hall
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:35 AM
To: Boston Celtics Digest
Subject: Haywood/Montross


Although Haywood may turn out to be a serviceable
center, I can see why many teams passed on him.
He does have the "lazy" label.
Big men from NC are not necessarily known for their
pro prowess. Remember Montross anyone?
Playing armchair GM, I admit I would have chosen
Tinsley or Cook with #21.
actually my picks were...Joe Johnson, Troy Murphy, and
Tinsley/Cook/Haywood.
I hope Forte and Brown don't turn out to be wasted picks.
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com