Re: BSG Says Go After Van Horn

["John Lyell" <johnlyell@hotmail.com>]

New Jersey has had worse luck than us. They have had  top picks and have not
progressed at all. Maybe it's that chemistry thing ? The injuries have
killed them also with Williams, Kittles, Van Horn and Martin .

Why would they want Anderson unless they planned moving Marbury to the 2
spot. . We need a physical inside presence, and Van Horn is not the person.
He would be good as a 3 depending on where they plan to play Walker. If we
can land a Zach Randolph is it better taking a Heywood, Forte, or Rodney
White or moving it for a veteran like Van Horn ?




----- Original Message -----
From: "Way Of The Ray" <wayray@ix.netcom.com>
To: <celtics@igtc.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 12:29 PM
Subject: BSG Says Go After Van Horn


> Alas the luxury tax and salary cap make it improbable....
>
> -- It looks like Keith Van Horn is on his way out in New Jersey. Now
HERE'S
> someone who would be an intriguing fit for the Celtics -- would NJ take
one
> of the two first-rounders and the last two years of Kenny's contract just
to
> get out of the last five years of Van Horn's deal? Hmmmmmm. Too bad the
> Celtics would never assume his contract with Pierce's extension and Walker
> on the books. Just for the record, I like Van Horn -- he just needs a new
> team, that's all.
>
>
>
>