[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: No banger necessary

Subject: Re: No banger necessary
From: Way Of The Ray <wayray@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2000 15:00:54 -0400
CC: celtics@igtc.com
Organization: Way Of The Ray
References: <14.8b9f1ec.26e7db19@aol.com>
Sender: owner-celtics@igtc.com

That's easy to say, when you've got a skilled guy the size of a city block manning the middle.
Ray

DJessen33@aol.com wrote:

> A couple of interesting comments in the following link. First that players feel it is better to not have the coach also be the GM. Second that West didn't feel a banger power forward is necessary anymore with the rule changes. Hey, that is pretty much where we are at(no banger other than VP)!...
>
> http://www.foxsports.com/columns/stories/bk0905swd_lazenby1.sml
>
> DJessen33

Follow-Ups:
- Re: No banger necessary
  - From: "John Lyell" <johnlyell@hotmail.com>

References:
- No banger necessary
  - From: DJessen33@aol.com

Prev by Date: Re: need to subscribe?
Next by Date: Recap of Vitaly chat at NBA.Com
Prev by thread: No banger necessary
Next by thread: Re: No banger necessary
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread