Re: 11 for 17 and Ruben Patterson?

["Josh Farber" <joshfarber@home.com>]

If this Seattle deal was to happen, would it be announced during the Draft?

Or would we hear about it in August?
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Way Of The Ray" <wayray@ix.netcom.com>
To: "Celtics" <Celtics@igtc.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 1:41 PM
Subject: 11 for 17 and Ruben Patterson?


> Preferable to the hard on Pitino has for Moiso at the moment
> (See Jersey Red article)....
> Ray
> 
> PS: Since the Seattle trade doesn't address the C's major needs,
> it's good in that it should keep them in the lottery once again, but
> also provide more of a talent base, for when the next GM and Coach
> comes in. I hope they draft Stevenson, Claxton, Bagaric, or
> E. Brown with the choice. It would be nice if Big O2 slips
> down to that location too.
> Ray
> 
> 
> --- "Berry, Mark  S" <berrym@BATTELLE.ORG> wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 12:18:39 -0400
> > From: "Berry, Mark  S" <berrym@BATTELLE.ORG>
> > Subject: 11 for 17 and Ruben Patterson?
> > To: "'celtics@igtc.com'" <celtics@igtc.com>
> > 
> > It's being discussed, according to NBATalk.com.
> > The Celts also would include
> > a salary (Calbert?). This is more appealing
> > than Christie and 21. I'd still
> > sit tight to see who is there. The Sonics want
> > Crawford, and he'll be there
> > at 11. But if Przybilla is there, how can we
> > pass? At 17, we probably could
> > add Stevenson, maybe Quentin Alexander, or
> > maybe one of the point guards
> > (not Dooling or Crawford).
> > 
> > Thoughts?
> > 
> > Mark 
> >
>