Re: Utah Jazz

[Dan Forant <dforant1@nycap.rr.com>]

Anderson is having an exceptional year. He's healthy and in excellent
shape. He should hold up if we don't have to push him too much. He makes a
couple bone head plays each game but who doesn't. Our most pressing need is
a point guard to back him up. We're living dangerously. tick-tick 

At 08:09 AM 1/4/00 -0800, you wrote:
>You're not kidding.  We need a backup true point guard
>really bad.  Doug Overton is terrible.  We should
>trade Dana tomorrow for a Vaughn-type player.  If
>Kenny goes down, we are in real trouble.
>
>--- W <titans@ihug.com.au> wrote:
>> > As you said, Eisley is a free agent this coming
>> summer as well. If you were
>> > the Jazz, who would you re-sign as your PG of the
>> future: Eisley or Vaughan?
>> 
>> Its no secret that I'm also a Jazz fan as well as a
>> C's one... so heres a unique
>> perspective.
>> 
>> The Jazz nixed a trade with the Raptors prior to the
>> season starting that would
>> have gotten then Doug Christie. The Raptors were
>> offered Howard Eisley but
>> demanded Jacque Vaughn and that is the sole reason
>> the Jazz nixed the trade, so
>> its obvious that the Jazz would rather move Eisley.
>> Vaughn would also come
>> cheaper to them and is more of a Stockton type than
>> Howard is. The Jazz will try
>> and build their future team with a Stockton
>> prototype...
>> 
>> The Jazz will also keep Adam Keefe as he is a vital
>> piece of their chemistry. He
>> is apparently a very close friend to Karl Malone and
>> the other members of the big
>> four (Stock / Horny / BRuss) therefore if they were
>> to trade anyone it would be
>> Pete Chilcutt; possibly Scott Padgett [former KY
>> collegiate rookie].
>> 
>> Personally, I'd love to see Jacque Vaughn on this
>> current Celtics lineup because
>> I believe it would improve the bench dramatically.
>> 
>> W
>> 
>> 
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
>http://messenger.yahoo.com
>
>