Holley article

["Thomas Murphy" <tfmiii@worldnet.att.net>]

Gotta go with Kestutis on this one. Sorry Gene. . .

TomM

> ------------------------------
> 
> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 08:37:42 -0600
> From: "Gene Kirkpatrick" <gkir@tjc.tyler.cc.tx.us>
> Subject: Holley is for real
> 
> A real s.o.b.  His article today proves that sportswriters think they
> are gods.  They think it's their role to pronounce and announce, as if
> they really knew something.  I'm not surprised at what I read, by I'm
> still astounded and outraged.  If these jerks knew anything about
> leading an organization or actually dealing with the problems of ten
> young millionaires who come to play hard about once a week, then I
> would like to read their insights.  As it is, they are only writing
> their own obituaries, not the coaches.
> 
> Oh, to have the freedom to pontificate and not bear any
> responsibility for what I say.  Holley's level is really the level of
> this list; but, we would crucify his little brain here.
> 
> Tired of small minded people who have no clue.
> 
> Gene
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 09:38:14 -0500
> From: Kestas <Kestutis.Kveraga@Dartmouth.EDU>
> Subject: Michael Holley finally says it. 
> 
> I've been waiting for someone in the Boston area papers to call Pitino on
> his "brilliant" performance as GM and coach, but May & Co. are too
chicken
> to come out and just say that the emperor has no clothes  - they prefer
the
> roundabout route. Only Michael Holley is man enough to plainly state
what's
> obvious -  that Pitino has failed. I disagree with Holley on the
Potapenko
> trade, but at least he's not hiding behind others' quotes and snide
asides.
> (Highly recommended reading for card-carrying members of the Pitino
> personality cult.) 
> 
>
http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/042/sports/It_s_time_for_Celtics_boss_to_c

> onfess+.shtml