[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C's Still Trying To Do A Blockbuster Trade
- To: Celtics@igtc.com
- Subject: Re: C's Still Trying To Do A Blockbuster Trade
- From: bird <bird@pixi.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 14:51:03 -1000
- In-Reply-To: <200008171512.e7HFCqq01159@igtc.igtc.com>
- References: <200008171512.e7HFCqq01159@igtc.igtc.com>
- Sender: owner-celtics@igtc.com
>From: "Berry, Mark S" <berrym@BATTELLE.ORG>
>
>I look at this Celtics team and see another 35-40 win season. They've added
>a few decent pieces-Moiso, Blount, Brown-but nothing that makes for a
>significant upgrade. And how much are these guys going to improve? Is Pierce
>suddenly going to average 30 ppg? Is Toine? Vitaly is what he is, and Kenny
>was as good as he is ever going to be last season, and he wasn't that good.
>Look at the rest of the roster. Where is the improvement coming from?
Yes. "How much are they going to improve?" is indeed the question,
but I don't understand your answer. Why is it so hard to imagine
that they will? Why do you always assume that the talent/skill level
of all of our players will remain static? I can see if your measured
opinion was that they probably won't, but you often come off as
dismissing the possibility altogether. I mean, players improve and
regress from season to season, and virtually day-to-day during the
season. Yes, Pierce (or Walker) could (suddenly) average 30 ppg
(well, 25 is more likely, and maybe even more desirable). V could
improve (as he did modestly last year in regards to his jumper).
Kenny improved defensively from the years before (agreed that that
isn't saying much, but I saw him actually _try_ on D last year, which
is in itself a vast improvement).
I guess I like to be more chauvanistic/optimistic/disturbed in
rooting for my teams. I try to balance a sense of critical thinking
with a maniacal obsession for the betterment of the team. In other
words, while I recognize that the team, if all the players played at
the exact same level as last year, would be at about the same level
of competition, I also know that that won't be the case -- some
players will improve, some won't, and some will actually get worse.
I like hoping/expecting that I'll see Walker/Pierce/Battie/Griffin/V
improve their games, and Moiso/Blount/Brown contribute. It makes me
feel all green and gooey inside.
>My point is, we can hold onto our precious players like Pierce and Walker
>and Vitaly forever, and settle for miserable seasons like the last two, or
>we can make a bold move to get better. Is it guaranteed to work? No, but at
>least it's a chance. Right now, we don't have one.
There's a chance we improve with a blockbuster trade, and absolutely
no chance to improve if we stay the same? We could debate/discuss
the percentage chance that the team would improve
(small/medium/large), but to say that there's no chance whatsoever is
a bit ridiculous.
Regards/farewell/yours,
Bill