Re: Hill not our answer

["Jaime Salud Castillo, Jr." <jaims@philonline.com>]

I agree with this one.  Our two best have big potentials but Hill already
has the full potentials (maturity wise and physically wise) in place and
it's just a matter of right time, coaching and right teammates til he could
get the "winning" thing.
----- Original Message -----
From: Josh Ozersky <josh_ozersky@yahoo.com>
To: Gene Kirkpatrick <gkir@tjc.tyler.cc.tx.us>; <celtics@igtc.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 1999 3:54 AM
Subject: Re: Hill not our answer


> I love Pierce and Walker, but at this point in their
> careers, Grant Hill is better than the two of them put
> together.  No disrespect:  he's a bona fide superstar,
> the top player in the NBA along with Tim Duncan.  He
> brings it every night, and he brings it in almost
> every department.  He IS that team.  Neither of our
> guys have proved they can have that kind of consistent
> excellence.
>
> --- Gene Kirkpatrick <gkir@tjc.tyler.cc.tx.us> wrote:
> > We already have Paul Pierce.  And Walker is better
> > than Grant Hill.
> >
> > And Fortson for Jalen Rose?  I want someone who will
> > crash through a
> > wall to get the ball.  Rose impresses me as well
> > rounded, but in a
> > dilettantish way.  Let's dive for the ball again.
> >
> > Gene
> >
> >
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
>
>