Learn from the master...
-- BEGIN included message
- Subject: Re: Knicks game over/unders
- From: "Warren" <bellw@idt.net>
- Date: Sun, 14 Nov 1999 05:03:08 GMT
- Newsgroups: alt.sports.basketball.nba.boston-celtics
- References: <P7dX3.2128$di5.40023929@interramp> <382DBC01.C2F3B2C5@bu.edu>
- Xref: mindspring alt.sports.basketball.nba.boston-celtics:62353
Dana was 16 under tonight. And EW has ALMOST NEVER gotten it done against a good defender. For example, look up his 96-97 stats against the Cav's when EW was playing for the C's. Which is one of the reasons I really liked Pitino's very first free agent signing. And 60% of the Celtics roster is a bunch of guys without the courage to fail - guys who will generally tighten up in the fourth quarter and shoot very poorly when the game is on the line. This one factor makes Walker second rate, and makes his 1st quarter wiggles the biggest jokes in the game. One final point, Anderson (+15 tonight) did it himself, and would have done it himself with the second string. When he's sound he's one of the best offensive pg's in the league, and his defense is no worse than average (again, when he's sound). By the way, don't count on Anderson to be sound for more than a third of the season. And the C's may well be the most poorly coached team in the league, at least if you count half-court set efficiency. Brandon Stahl <bstahl@bu.edu> wrote in message news:382DBC01.C2F3B2C5@bu.edu... > > > Warren wrote: > > Barros continues to be weakest link in top 9, with marginal > > offensive production ane terrible defense. > > A quick note on this one. Barros, first of all, is a point guard. He is? In what league? I agree that he can't play anywhere else.
-- END included message