RE: Dana and VP

[John Lyell <Jlyell@concentric.net>]

I have to disagree, Dana is a terrible point guard and the reason they 
chose Billups in the draft.  He can not orchestrate an offense and make too 
many stupid passes.



On Thursday, March 11, 1999 10:41 AM, Josh Ozersky 
[SMTP:josh_ozersky@yahoo.com] wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Dana is actually a pretty good point guard.  Don't hold his scoring
> ability against him. He's a better defender than Kenny Anderson, who
> is still one  of the best in the game despite his recent bad play.
> You guys have to tough this stretch out.  Hard to do after what Pitino
> calls the worst loss he's had in 25 years, but there it is anyway.
> For my part, I don't really understand the VP desire on Rick's part.
> I guess  he looks at the guy as a cop, someone to batter the Charles
> Oakley's of the world.  Then why not go out and get some minimum wage
> goon?  I don't understand the attraction of a center who cant rebound
> or block shots.  What is it that Potapenko is supposed to do for us?
> It's not like he can pass out of the post, either.  (Which would suck
> anyway -- I hate that kind of basketball, unless it is done with great
> speed and crispness, which it never is.)  Everyone should go home and
> watch the Orlando game.
>
>
>
>
> ---Phe Meas  wrote:
> >
> > The Lakers waived Blount and Armstrong. I think the C's should pick
> them
> > both up for the minimum. Blount is another big body who is an all-star
> > compared to the broken nose guy the C's have on the IR. Armstrong is
> > more of a point guard than Barros will ever be. I'm not taking a
> shot at
> > Barros because he can play ball but not as a PG. What do you think?
> >
> > ..................................Where do you want to go tomorrow?
> >
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> DO YOU YAHOO!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>