[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Ricky has to be lying about this one!



This post amplifies my thoughts. Anderson would do better w/the Knicks, and
we would do better without him. Childs and Dudley would be an upgrade for
us. The Knicks know that they have a better team then they had for years
now, the addition of Anderson may be just what they need. The NY team
really turned it around with Camby and Sprewell. The Celts could do the
same. Capologists: how would this deal fly???


At 08:40 PM 6/24/99 EDT, you wrote:
>In a message dated 6/24/99 3:26:41 PM Eastern Daylight Time, tjoyce@mit.edu 
>writes:
>
><<  But don't you think that the Knicks will
> be out looking for a better pg after the finals? The memory will be fresh,
> but then they have some hefty contracts weighing them down with their
> current pgs. Maybe not possible to do with that. >>
>
>I'd try to get the Knicks to give us Childs & Dudley for Anderson & either 
>Ellison or Popeye.  Childs would provide us with a PG who can play defense 
>and sometimes provide offense.  Childs has been at his best when playing
with 
>the athletic Knicks (Sprewell & Camby) rather than playing in Ewings slow 
>down game.  Dudley would give us a back up center who can rebound and play 
>some D as well.  He's got his shortcomings but is a hell of a lot better
than 
>Riley or Schintzius.
>
>George
>
>
>