[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Pitino's stupid things? Okay.
>Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 12:39:30 -0500
>From: "Christopher J. Littlefield" <cjlitt@erols.com>
>Subject: Pitino's stupid things? Okay.
>
>Pitino's worst moves: I think they were stupid, ill-conceived, and
>hasty. This list is qualified by my separation of all his personnel
>decisions from his undisputed coaching ability. Last year's team did far
>more than it should have been capable of. Anything I say has nothing do
>do with his coaching. His learning curve in personnel matters has been
>steep, as well, but my _feeling_ is that he took what little he had to
>work with and proceeded to further hamstring himself in the areas which
>he himself admitted needed the most improvement, cap flexibility and
>talent-level.
>
>The stupid moves
>
>1) Signing Travis Knight for $20 mil
>Spent money unnecessarily on a below-average talent that forced him to
>cut Rick Fox, the team's anchor, who wanted nothing more than to be part
>of the rebuilding.
I don't believe Fox was the teams anchor. Walker was and is.
>
>2) Signing Chris Mills for $33 mil
>Traded Mills for Thomas, McCarty, and Jones. Jones was cut. Thomas
>brough some value back in the Anderson trade, but basically trade was
>for McCarty. Could we have used that additional cap space this year?
>Did we need a small forward that bad? I guess not bad enough
>to keep him.
We needed some athletic bodies, evidently Mills didn't fit into Pitino's
plans. McCarty may be a player, we'll have to wait and see past this injury.
>
>3) Trading Eric Williams for 2 2nd round draft picks and then moaning
>because he needed 'another scorer'
Williams came into camp if I remember correctly over weight and with a bad
attitude. Pitino made an example of him. Williams should have known better
for a second year man. Sure teams would have paid more for Williams, so
would the tooth fairy.
>C'Mon. We'll never know what happened here, but when the trade went
>down, teams _called_ Boston to tell Pitino that they would have
>paid _much_ more for Williams. Maybe we could've gotten another 1st
>rounder, maybe gotten Keon Clark. Who knows. Additionally, the cap
>room generated by Williams' trade was not necessary to sign Mills. It
>was for Edney. So we traded Williams for Edney. Was that smart?
>
>4) Additionally I question the signing/trading of Tony Massenburg, but
>it's not as bad as the first 3.
Hey we needed somebody in the middle, Celts fans were itchy for wins.
>
>These mistakes took place right at the start of the Pitino tenure and
>were hastily made, ill-considered decisions.
>That qualifies them but does not, in any sense, justify or rationalize
>them.
>
>I think they were stupid moves, and not just in retrospect. Knight was
>never going to be the banging center Pitino
>was raving about him becoming. Did anyone think otherwise? He needed
>scoring. Why get rid of Fox and Williams?
Fox played sporadic ball for the Celts, with LA he's a star, much be
Hollywood.
>
>cut