[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rumor



I agree with Mishra.  I do this in a heart beat.  E. Jones is great! 
Campbell away from Shaq. is much better.  Troy

----------
> From: skmishra <skmishra@sprintmail.com>
> To: peter delevett <pdelevett@amcity.com>; Celtics <Celtics@igtc.com>
> Subject: Re: Rumor
> Date: Wednesday, February 03, 1999 1:25 PM
> 
> If I were Charlotte I would do this deal in a hurry..Glen Rice may be
good
> but he is not as good as Jones + Campbell. If this deal gets done then it
> implies Rice is not injured and is just using injury as a leverage for
his
> contract negotiations. Rice is a great outside shooter but he needs the
ball
> to make plays, his defense is non-existent. He can be a great acquisition
> provided he is 1st or 2nd option as scorer..as a 3rd option he will be a
> bust. - Mishra
> -----Original Message-----
> From: peter delevett <pdelevett@amcity.com>
> 
> 
> >This is probably another stupid ESPN rumor, and it doesn't concern the
> >Celtics, but the Hornets would have gotten rooked on this deal. Then
again,
> if
> >they think Elden is worth Glen Rice, maybe that will change some
people's
> >opinions of Campbell's value. I wonder if the Lakers turned this down --
do
> >they still think they could get more? Imagine what they would be like
with
> >Rice bombing away from outside and Shaquille inside. Scary.
> >
> >
> >The Lakers and Hornets discussed, but will not consummate, a
multi-player
> >trade that would have
> >                          sent Elden Campbell and Eddie Jones to
Charlotte
> in
> >exchange for Glen Rice, B.J. Armstrong and
> >                          J.R. Reid, sources told ESPN.
> >
> >                          The deal, according to sources, was instigated
by
> >Charlotte, which is in the midst of a bitter
> >                          contract negotiation with Rice. Rice will make
> $5.4
> >million this season and has an option year for
> >                          the 1999-2000 season at $7 million. But Rice
> would
> >like a new deal.
> >
>