Re: Walker for Webber

["Icarus" <skmishra@sprintmail.com>]

I wouldn't do Walker for Webber. Why should we? Walker is a superior and
more durable player plus he does't come with the additional baggage. -
Mishra

-----Original Message-----
From: Robertson, Kevin, CON, OASD(HA)/TMA <Kevin.Robertson@tma.osd.mil>
To: 'Celtics' <celtics@igtc.com>
Date: Friday, September 04, 1998 5:30 AM
Subject: Walker for Webber


>I agree... I'd love to see that... especially if Pitino can make him play
>center... his natural position, that he has rejected since college. Then
bag
>someone for the starting PF position, Ratliff maybe. Also, it might be
>better... Webber's talent has gone up, but his stock has gone down.
>
>Center: Webber, DeClerq, Ellison
>PF: Ratliff, Popeye, Knight
>SF: Pierce, McCarty
>SG: Mercer, Bowen
>PG: Anderson, Barros
>
>>if the young coach is
>>dead set on trading Walker, he and a couple salary anchors for Webber.
>>Makes perfect sense.
>
>