[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
NBA Owners Agree To Try Luxury Tax
The lockout will be over by the second week of November, if not sooner.
Ray
NBA Players, Owners Make Progress
By CHRIS SHERIDAN AP Basketball Writer
NEW YORK (AP) -- In one of the first signs of
possible progress in the NBA lockout, the owners
agreed Friday to accept the union's concept of a
luxury tax on some contracts to see if such a
system will slow salary growth.
"We are willing to try it the union's way, but
they have to agree that if it doesn't work, we
then have to try it our way," deputy
commissioner Russ Granik said.
The league asked for a two-year trial, with
higher tax rates and a lower threshold than the
union had proposed. A hard salary cap would kick
in for the 2000-01 season if the percentage of
league revenue devoted to salaries failed to
drop from 57 percent to 52 percent.
The union did not immediately respond.
According to the league's projections, the tax
would have no impact on 85 percent of the
league's future contracts.
The league also included an exemption for any
player who accepts a so-called Larry Bird
contract with a 5 percent raise. Such a rule
would allow the Chicago Bulls to re-sign Michael
Jordan for about $36 million next season without
having to pay any tax.
Although the sides may have found a mechanism
that will get them to the middle ground on the
main economic issue, a host of other topics
still have to be resolved before a collective
bargaining agreement could be put up for a
ratification vote.
Granik said it will take about a week to settle
the rest of the issues after the sides agree to
a new economic system.
The NBA has already canceled the first two weeks
of the season, or a total of 99 games. More
games will be lost if the sides can't reach
agreement soon.
There was no decision Friday from arbitrator
John Feerick on the issue of whether players
with guaranteed contracts must be paid during
the lockout. Feerick's decision is due Sunday.
The league's proposal calls for a tax to be
levied on any contract signed under the Bird
exception for more than $2.6 million, which was
the average salary in the 1997-98 season.
The tax would be paid by owners, with the
revenue redistributed to low-revenue teams. In
theory, it would deter teams from signing overly
lucrative contracts.
The tax rate would be 50 percent of the amount
over $2.6 million for all contracts worth up to
$10 million annually. For contracts worth
between $10 million and $15 million, the tax
would be 100 percent, between $15 and $20
million it would be 150 percent, and for
contracts worth more than $20 million the rate
would be 200 percent, Granik said.
Under the union's tax proposal, which was
presented to the owners Tuesday, a 50 percent
tax would be levied on any Bird contract worth
more than $18 million annually. (The Bird rule
allows teams to exceed the salary cap to retain
their own free agents.)
"The proposal made by the union would have
resulted in a tax on only two of the
approximately 400 contracts in effect last
season," Granik said. "We analyzed it every
which way, and like the union's other proposals,
it would have increased -- not decreased -- the
percentage of league revenue paid to players.
"However, in the spirit of compromise we have
attempted to fashion a system that uses a tax,
instead of a hard salary cap, even though we're
skeptical about the ability of any tax system to
keep player salaries at a set percentage of
league revenue," Granik said.
AP-NY-10-16-98 1740EDT<