Re: If Celts Deal Walker

[Dan Forant <dforant1@nycap.rr.com>]

I never intimated any of the statements below. I just stated Walker is the
franchise. The meaning of posts gets lost along the way. I personally never
said Pierce would be a Walker. I did say Pierce should be an excellent
addition to our firepower.
Dan
>X-Originating-IP: [170.223.154.189]
>From: "Jim Meninno" <jim_meninno@hotmail.com>
>To: dforant1@nycap.rr.com, celtics@igtc.com, witchcraft1998@hotmail.com
>Subject: Re: If Celts Deal Walker
>Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 13:51:45 PDT
>
>No doubt he's a better passer than Shawn Bradley and a better shot 
>blocker than Damon Stoudamire, too.  Now, if he were a better shooter 
>than Mercer and a better rebounder than Walker, we would have something.  
>
>Seriously, though, if you are saying that you know Paul Pierce is going 
>to come into the league and immediately be a more complete player than 
>Antoine Walker, I'd have to say you must be joking.  
>
>Everything I have heard about Pierce is that he does one thing (score) 
>and he does it very well.  That's going to be very welcome on the 
>Celtics, but to imply that it somehow means that Antoine Walker is 
>expendable is ludicrous.  Who's going to get rebounds?  Who's going to 
>score in the paint?  Who's going to defend forwards over 6'8"?   
>
>WC, we get the point.  You like Paul Pierce.  Now if you could come back 
>to reality....
>
>Jim
>
>>From: "Witch Craft" <witchcraft1998@hotmail.com>
>>To: dforant1@nycap.rr.com, celtics@igtc.com
>>Subject: Re: If Celts Deal Walker
>>Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 12:59:42 PDT
>>
>>You continue to worship a false god.  Repent and follow the path
>>of Pierce, the best player on the C's: A better shooter than Walker
>>and a better rebounder than Mercer.
>>WC
>
>
>______________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>