[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
David D'Alessandro: Season On The Brink
[Star Ledger] [Sports]
At least they agree season is on brink
11/29/98
By Dave D'Alessandro
STAFF WRITER
It's a wonderful life, Steve Kerr says. He loves his job,
but nothing beats being home for Christmas. So while he
would like to be playing basketball, he is like most of his
peers, preferring to spend the holiday surrounded by
family, perhaps using some of this quality time watching
Frank Capra's charming odyssey about a common man's
self-realization.
"That's one of my favorite movies," the Chicago Bulls'
union representative said.
He paused. You could almost see a race going on between his
brain and his expression.
Then, dubiously: "But isn't that the movie," he added,
"where he loses all his money and becomes so frustrated
that he ends up deciding to jump off a bridge?"
This is what it's like to be associated with the NBA these
days: You spend most of your waking hours in an obscure
hunt for dark clouds lurking behind silver linings.
The league's act of self-immolation has become so
protracted it has lasted longer than a typical Dennis
Rodman marriage. The preseason is long gone, so is the
November schedule, and December slipped away this weekend.
More than $300 million has been lost in player salaries.
Another vast, untold sum -- also in nine figures -- has
been lost in league revenue. And now, the league and its
administrators who ordered the lockout 151 days ago have
come face-to-face with the decision they have been dreading
all along -- whether to blow up the entire season.
"We're not going to set a drop-dead date because that would
just sound like a threat," said deputy commissioner Russ
Granik. "We all know that eventually, as each day goes by,
we're all going to realize that we can't play a season. But
to just throw a date out there now, that's not going to
make it any easier to make a deal."
Not only are owners and players "on different planets,"
Granik says, "I don't even know how we can get on the same
planet," a mildly overstated reality that inspires debate
in every corner of the NBA's universe. But now that
negotiations have broken off again, the debate about
whether the season will be canceled has taken the form of a
grotesque office pool, with all the conversation focused on
the 'when' and not the 'if.'
Follow the bouncing kill date:
"I thought all along that the owners' drop-dead date is
around Christmas," said Chicago-based agent Herb Rudoy. "I
would find it hard to believe the league isn't being
pressured by NBC and all its big sponsors to get something
done by then."
"I would think it would have to get done by Dec. 15," said
Vinny Del Negro, the San Antonio guard. "But that includes
the couple of weeks it takes of writing up the agreement
and getting it ratified."
Then there were the dire predictions of two team
executives, one from each conference, both of whom claimed
Friday to be in rough agreement with every peer they have
consulted recently.
"We're right at the edge, and it looks like we're going
over," the Eastern Conference exec said. "I'll give it a
two-week window, no more. If we don't have an agreement in
principle by the 11th of December or so, I see no other
option than for David (Stern) to pull the plug."
Added the Western Conference GM, "It's really hard for
anyone to be optimistic anymore. After this past week (and
the cessation of bargaining), most of us think we're done.
You can't start a season in late January."
You also can't haggle without an opponent. For five, long,
silent days now, Billy Hunter has decided to let the league
dictate the schedule: "Russ' last words to me were that
he'd get back to me when he thought it was appropriate,"
said Hunter, the executive director of the players' union.
"So I'll wait. I'll wait until he gets back to me."
Granik or Stern probably will call Hunter sometime early
this week, but the same ground rules will apply: "No
concessions," they'll tell him, "no negotiation." And even
if there is a bargaining session by the end of this week,
an agreement could take another week or so to achieve. As
Del Negro suggested, a verbal agreement would take at least
five days to get it all down on paper. And by then, it
could be the third week of December.
Add another two weeks for trifling matters such as getting
200 free agents signed to contracts, another two weeks of
training camp, and you're looking at an opening night
sometime in mid-January. Some, however, believe that
getting past that initial hurdle will be hard enough, given
that GMs may have to learn to operate under what could be
an entirely new set of rules.
"It will be bedlam," Golden State coach P.J. Carlesimo
predicted. "I don't think there are a lot of intelligent
opinions out there on how this is going to go down. The
number of free agents out there -- and the uncertainty that
comes from what could be dramatically different rules -- is
going to make things very difficult. How can you marry that
combination, and then squeeze it into the shortest period
of time that has ever confronted any group of owners and
general managers? (That) makes it impossible to predict
what's going to happen. There's no way in the world."
And keep in mind, he's talking about a best-case scenario.
While this is going on, the league's vice president for
operations, Matt Winick, will be seated in front of a
computer with his staff around the clock, trying to
formulate an alternative schedule that adheres to available
dates in 29 separate arenas. His only mandate, he said, is
to give every team the same number of home and road games.
How many games that amounts to, however, has yet to be
decided.
"I can't see going less than 56 games," the Eastern GM
said. "At least that would give you a pair of games against
each team. And if you start in mid-January, you could
easily extend the regular season into the first 10 days of
May, because arenas keep those dates open for the playoffs
anyway. The only real certainty is that you can't stretch
the Finals past the Fourth of July, because no one watches
TV that weekend. But there are a lot of exotic solutions
going around."
One involves the multigame series, similar to that used in
baseball. It would reduce the travel in a compacted
schedule, but it would require playing consecutive home
games against the same opponent. Another possibility is a
strictly intraconference format, which would uphold
rivalries but also upset every Western Conference team that
wouldn't benefit from the guaranteed sellout that
accompanies Michael Jordan's annual visit.
But in terms of numbers, you don't need as many as you
think to constitute a legitimate season. Consider that
through 41 games last year -- the season's midpoint -- the
top eight teams in the East were Chicago, Indiana, Miami,
Atlanta, Cleveland, Charlotte, the Knicks and Nets in that
order. Those eight were the same teams that posted the best
records after 82 games -- in almost an identical order. In
the West, the top eight teams after 41 games were Seattle,
the Lakers, San Antonio, Utah, Phoenix, Portland, Minnesota
and Houston. The same eight teams reached the postseason,
in virtually the same order.
Put simply, the second half of the regular season
accomplished nothing, other than to create enough time for
Utah to climb over three teams into the top seed.
But seeds and standings and playoff matchups are subjects
that seem very distant this week. Right now, most would
settle for an announcement that the owners and players are
willing to talk to each other again.
"We can't agree on the shape of the table," league counsel
Jeff Mishkin said. "We can't agree on what we have agreed
to. That's not a conducive atmosphere for productive
negotiations."
As usual, the players tend to disagree. While most of them
know that a kill date is probably only a few weeks away,
many of them remain optimistic that a deal will be struck.
Danny Schayes, the Orlando rep, said, "It's obvious neither
side is going to get everything it wants, but the thinking
(among players) is that a deal can still get done in the
next couple of weeks."
And curiously, some of that optimism is based on the skill
of their adversary.
"We're dealing with a man who brought this league from the
dumps," Houston's Eddie Johnson said. "Stern is like the
guy who goes 0-for-15 one night. He knows he can come back
the next night and go 12-for-15. He's not going to stop
shooting because he knows he can accomplish things if he
keeps trying. He brought the NBA from bad times. I think he
believes he can do it again."
Yet even if Stern does salvage a season, there's no way of
measuring the harm already done to the sport. Some teams
already have begun implementing some clever marketing
schemes to ease the damage, but it's likely that many fans
have turned away. Some will stay away for good.
"I don't expect their sympathy," said Tim Legler, the
Washington guard who has been the most outspoken critic of
his own union. "I don't blame them for being bitter, or if
they go away and don't come back. I would be the same way.
I would take the basketball out of my daughter's hand and
put a soccer ball at the end of her foot."
The message, of course, being very clear: Go jump off a
bridge, NBA.
© 1998 The Star-Ledger. Used with permission.