Re: Celts Bucks 95-104

[Dorine Pratt <norine@sover.net>]

We noticed, Dan, we just didn't say anything.
Dorine

Dan wrote:

> Just checking whose observant! Only one so far, not good.
>
> >Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 09:27:17 -0500
> >From: jmc@ptc.com (Jonathan McIntyre)
> >Subject: Re: Celts Bucks 95-104
> >
> >Dan said:
> >>    Listened to the game on the Bucks radio station and the announcers had
> >> nothing but praise for the Celts and Pitino, stating the Celts play a
> >> frenzied pace, with a great deal of nerve and savy, and that the Celts will
> >> be a great team. Never heard such gushing from opposing announcers.  Thomas
> >> got the start. Dee Brown played well the first half hitting the go ahead
> >> score (3) at end of 1st quarter. Walker very cold shooting early made up
> >> for it in 2nd quarter. The Bucks in 6th place in the Western Conference are
> >> not a team to take lightly, think they won 6 in a row and are getting
> >> plenty of home support with sellouts. With the shooting percentage way down
> >> in half for both teams, it's hard to say if defense was even that
> important.
> >>
> >>    Buck announcers said Celt management won't break the bank for Walker,
> >
> >Hmm, that's interesting.  The Celtics team that I was watching played an
> >identical game to the one you described, right down to the final score,
> >but they were playing the Minnesota Timberwolves instead.
> >
> >Maybe the Bucks announcers got on the wrong flight.  ;-)
> >
> >Jon Mc
> >
> >