RE: rumored trade

[John Lyell <Jlyell@concentric.net>]

I don't know if that makes sense unless it includes a John Wallace or Doug 
Christie which is doubtful or Toronto's #1 for a chance at Mike Bibby ? 
 Camby has been a disappointment.  The only thing he does well for a big 
man is block shots.  He has not shown a good inside game, and plays around 
the perimeter.  Seems like a more expensive Walter McCarty.

Tonight we saw some of the potential Travis has, he did it all, block 
shots, rebound, hit from the outside, and drive  to the hoop ! If he can 
only do it consistently.


If it involved Jersey and Camby ended up with Calipari & we got Jayson 
Williams that would be better
Or Calipari was interested in Stoudamire, would he take Knight , Billups, 
and ? for Williams & Cassell ?


Th Celtics looked real good tonight.  Barros, Knight, Bowen,  & Walker all 
had big games.  I think Antoine had a triple double.







On Sunday, February 01, 1998 2:04 PM, JOzersky@aol.com 
[SMTP:JOzersky@aol.com] wrote:
> That got your attention, didn't it?  Well, here is one more from rumor
> mongerer Mitch Lawrence of teh NY daily news.   Menage a Trois between 
us,
> Orlando, and Toronto, in which we give up Billups and Knight, and get 
Camby,
> another player, and one or two picks, including a first rounder.  I know 
it
> sounds too good to be true, so it probably isn't.  But I really feel we 
need
> a point guard.  Chauncey is a great offensive talent and a very good
> defender, but he will never be true point guard, let's face it.  Even 
Dana
> looks upcourt more.  And with Antoine and Ron, we have enough offense;
> Chauncey is not a third option kind of player.  I say do this deal, and 
trade
> Camby if you want for Jayson Williams, and use the pick on a real point. 
 Or
> some other trade, or use the lightning quick Camby.  Whatever.
>
> josh
>