[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Steve Bulpett Comments On The Possibility Of A New League
Boston Herald - 12/30/98
In a different league: Going against NBA would be
difficult
by Steve Bulpett
Wednesday, December 30, 1998
The talk of a new basketball league has been raised often
in the last several months, with little attention being
paid. And as the deadline looms for the cancellation of
the NBA season, talk is again being generated that the
union will take its business elsewhere.
While this remains a possibility, even union director
Billy Hunter agrees there is little chance a new circuit
would be able to approach the scope of the NBA.
``I agree wholeheartedly that it would probably take some
time for a new league to develop to where the NBA is,'' he
said. ``But what I would say is that there has to be some
down side for the NBA, as well.
``I don't think the marquee players would have problems
under any circumstances. If Michael Jordan were around and
were inclined to play, I doubt that there would be any
reservations about paying him whatever he wants.''
Beyond the logistics issues with getting a new league off
the ground, there is the fundamental question of whether
the union should be angling toward a solution that will
benefit well less than half its membership to start - and
at a reduced rate for most of those who will get jobs at
all.
The NBA, while saying it will proceed next year with or
without the union's blessing, is banking on the inability
of a new league to compete with an organization already in
place.
Addressing the union's talk of a new entity, commissioner
David Stern said: ``I am aware that there are certain
agents who are busy trying to start another league. All I
can say to our players is that maybe that will get started
and it can take care of 100 or so players. But that would
be consistent with the philosophy that has been espoused
in these negotiations, which is to protect the high end
(players).
``Our NBA will continue and it will thrive, but it will be
a much different NBA.''
In many respects, the situation could be likened to the
now-defunct ABL's battle with the WNBA, in which the
former had the better players to start and the latter was
simply better funded, sponsored and organized.
While Hunter said there are ``millionaires and
billionaires'' willing to get involved in a new league,
the chances of making inroads against the NBA are slim.
Consider first that NBA clubs either own their buildings
or have leases and, with hockey dates figured in, there
would be little room for a new league to get court time -
if the new clubs were allowed in the door at all.
For instance, a union league team wishing to play in
Boston would be pushed aside to Boston College or the
Worcester Centrum because of potential lease and schedule
conflicts in the FleetCenter.
Also, would enough sponsors, with NBA contracts already,
move to support a new and competing league?
``I haven't received any offers,'' Hunter said of specific
ownership in a new league. ``One of the limitations you
encounter among folks who may be interested is that
they're not inclined to be used. They don't want to be
used as leverage. They let you know, directly or
indirectly, that they're interested, but the position is
that they're waiting for the (NBA) season to be
canceled.''
All of which begs the question being asked by the NBA: Are
the middle and lower salaried players willing to forfeit a
season to turn down what the owners are offering,
particularly when it's clear that most would be left
behind if the union starts a new league?