[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Good NY Times Article On Celtics & Other Teams' Revenues



The Celtics made $12.3 million profit on revenues of $75.3 million....


          December 24, 1998

          Profits and Losses in League's Ledger



          By RICHARD SANDOMIR

              The National Basketball Association is like a chain
              of 29 franchised stores arrayed strategically
          nationwide, each catering to a different market, each
          hoping to sell out its inventory of seats. The chain's
          employees earn unusually high salaries, but, in turn,
          the 29 outlets can charge steep prices to watch their
          costumed workers perform in glitzy arenas or on
          television.

          But the nearly six-month-old lockout has altered the
          chain's business. The stores are closed, the employees
          are not being paid and advance ticket revenues must be
          refunded on a prorated basis each month. The only
          bright spot for team finances is the combined $465
          million being paid by NBC and Turner Sports, the
          league's national television partners, even if the
          season is shuttered.

          The financial health of the N.B.A.'s teams has been at
          the crux of the league's negotiating stance as it
          presses for something resembling cost certainty. The
          N.B.A has claimed financial distress for some of its
          franchises and seeks relief in a restructured contract
          with the players. But in an industry generating $2
          billion annually, and with most team finances
          unavailable to the public, it is difficult to discern
          exactly where the problems are.

          The league and the players union disagree on how many
          teams are losing money, but only two teams, the Boston
          Celtics and the San Antonio Spurs, make their finances
          public. The Celtics are a public company and the
          privately owned Spurs released their statement in a
          so-far-unsuccessful bid to get city government
          financing for a new arena to replace the five-year-old
          Alamodome.

          Last season, the Celtics missed the playoffs under
          Coach Rick Pitino but still earned $12.3 million on
          revenues of $75.7 million. Sparked by the return of
          center David Robinson and the addition of the rookie
          Tim Duncan, the Spurs returned to the playoffs, but
          lost $1.8 million on revenues of $65.9 million.

          Without the playoff revenue, the Spurs' loss would have
          been $3.9 million.

          The largest difference in the teams' revenues was
          derived from ticket sales: the Celtics collected $39.1
          million (which may include luxury-suite income, but the
          statement is not explicit) compared with the Spurs'
          $24.3 million.

          The Spurs' and Celtics' figures are normal for N.B.A.
          teams -- greater than unsuccessful teams with lower
          payrolls like the Los Angeles Clippers, but less than
          what the Chicago Bulls reap and spend, several sports
          finance experts said.

          Forbes magazine estimated the Bulls' 1997-98 revenues
          at $112.2 million and operating profit at $8.6 million,
          while the Knicks made $18.3 million on $109.7 million
          in revenues. The Clippers took in $39.3 million, but
          lost $4.9 million.

          "The Celtics are a typical big-market team, but they're
          just another tenant in an arena, and the Spurs are
          similar, in a small market," said Michael Ozanian,
          statistics editor of Forbes magazine.

          In the case of the Celtics and the Spurs, neither owns
          the arena they play in. Teams like the Bulls, Knicks,
          Philadelphia 76ers, Detroit Pistons, Washington Wizards
          and Portland Trail Blazers have the advantages of
          earning revenues from other events like hockey and
          circuses, while paying no rent to a city or county.

          "For some, a lot of revenue is tied to paying off debt
          service to build the arena, and the other events were
          supposed to be gravy," Ozanian said. "Someone like Abe
          Pollin has a lot of debt, and what was gravy isn't the
          case now." Pollin owns the year-old MCI Center, the
          Wizards and the Washington Capitals.

          The Knicks and the 76ers have the added edge in also
          being part of the same company that carries their games
          on cable television. The companies are now losing out
          by not being able to sell lucrative commercial
          advertising to their teams' games.

          The Celtics reported TV and radio revenues of $28
          million, $11.4 million from NBC. The rest came from
          Turner Sports, and local radio and TV deals.

          The Spurs received $14.7 million from NBC and Turner,
          and $18.7 million more from local media rights and
          arena advertising, the latter an unusually steep figure
          for a team in one of the league's smallest markets that
          also plays in an arena without a corporate name
          attached to it.

          Although the Celtics did not itemize what they received
          from royalties from the national licensing that they
          split with all other teams, the Spurs revealed their
          share to be $2.9 million.

          The Spurs, who receive 80 percent of the revenues from
          the city-owned Alamodome's luxury suites and club
          seats, reaped about $2 million from that lucrative
          area. Suite revenues at the Fleet Center in Boston are
          divided among the Celtics, the Bruins and debt
          payments; the Celtics may have included that income in
          ticket sales.

          For both teams, the largest expense is salaries. The
          Celtics reported $43 million in total basketball
          expenses, most of which is paid to their players; the
          Spurs' reported a $34.9 million payroll, led by the
          $12.4 million paid to Robinson.

          But a comparison of the Celtics and the Spurs presents
          an anomaly. While Boston is the sixth-largest market,
          three times larger than San Antonio, the Spurs' $67.7
          million in expenses is greater than the Celtics' $61.9
          million.

          "Keep in mind, whether it's a small market or a big
          one, teams are competing in the same market for
          players," said Paul Much, managing director of Houlihan
          Lokey Howard & Zukin, an investment banking firm in
          Chicago. "And while big-market teams usually have
          bigger revenues, they usually have higher expenses."

          Although the players are not getting paid during the
          lockout, coaches, executives and other employees will
          continue to be. To cut down expenses, teams will almost
          certainly lay off workers if the season is canceled.

          The Celtics must pay one unusually high salary during
          the lockout -- Pitino's. Even if Pitino doesn't coach a
          game this season, his contract to be coach, president
          and director of basketball operations calls for annual
          salaries of $6.75 million through May 6, 2003, and $2
          million annually through 2007.

          The team will also keep paying Red Auerbach, its former
          coach and general manager. Now a consultant, Auerbach
          receives $250,000 a year for life; he got bonuses of
          $500,000, $600,000 and $100,000 in each of the past
          three years.

          Although all teams will have to pay ongoing expenses if
          the season is canceled, the Celtics and the Spurs won't
          have to pay rent to their landlords. The Celtics' Fleet
          Center lease requires no rent payments, while the
          Spurs' payment of $5,000 a game is not required if the
          team doesn't play.

          But the Seattle SuperSonics and the Golden State
          Warriors are in rent disputes at the Key Arena and the
          New Arena in Oakland, Calif., respectively, and
          disagree over whether their leases require them to pay
          rent even if they don't play.

          The city of Seattle may lose $4.8 million if the N.B.A.
          cancels the season.

          "We could go to arbitration, but after Jan. 1, we'll
          sit down and try to negotiate," said Sue Donaldson, the
          Seattle City Council President. "We feel the team has
          an obligation to pay, whether they play games or not."

          The Warriors' quarterly rent of $375,000, and other
          payments, are needed to repay the debt incurred by the
          county for $100 million in arena renovations.

          The team and Alameda County will go to arbitration next
          month to settle their dispute, said Kyle Spencer, a
          Warriors spokesman, over what the team thinks is a
          lease clause that absolves it from paying rent during a
          work stoppage.



                Copyright 1998 The New York Times Company