[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Steve Bullpet Explains The Owners Latest Proposal
Bulpett notes Antoine can make $84 million with the Celtics on a
seven-year deal.
Boston Herald
Stern checks in with players
by Steve Bulpett
Friday, December 18, 1998
NBA commissioner David Stern executed a Union Bypass, as
players received the league's latest proposal by messenger
yesterday.
The move, designed to avoid the union's leadership and
take the word directly to the rank and file, is clearly an
attempt to gather support for the owners' stance and force
a vote among players.
The fact the numbers look quite appetizing will presumably
add fuel to a situation in which players missed yet
another paycheck Tuesday. But it remains to be seen
whether the action by the league will further inflame a
leadership that has already gotten into heated arguments
with Stern and his fellow negotiators.
``As the 1998-99 season slips away from us, it is critical
that I communicate directly to you the owners' current
collective bargaining proposals,'' Stern said to the
players in his cover letter as part of a nine-page message
complete with charts and graphs.
``I recognize and respect your right to reject these
proposals. However, it is important that there be no doubt
about the precise terms you consider to be such a `bad
deal' that you would prefer to lose the entire season.''
Much of what was detailed thereafter has already been put
forth to the union leaders. Among the key changes is a
move in the yearly allowable raise from 10 percent to 12.5
percent on contracts in the Larry Bird Exception (which
allows teams to go over the cap to keep their own free
agents) and from 5 percent to 7.5 percent on all other
contracts.
As noted in a Wednesday Herald item on the Celtics'
Antoine Walker, the NBA is still seeking to categorize
players in three groups for the purpose of calculating
Bird contracts - 0-6 years, 7-9 years and 10-plus years.
But Walker would be getting a raise of more than $1
million a year from the last league offer.
If the current proposal is accepted, Walker would be able
to receive as much as $84,218,750 over the seven-year life
of a free agent contract from the Celtics. His yearly
average would be $12,031,250. If Walker were to sign
elsewhere, he would be limited to what that team could
offer under the cap.
While the offer on the table would clearly affect players
looking to make their first big score, the NBA attempts to
grandfather in those already making big money (hello, Mr.
Jordan) by noting that they can take the maximum as
measured by the chart or 105 percent of their prior
salary. That means Jordan could still make $30-something
million if he decides to play again rather than the $12.2
million starting point for those in his experience
category next year. (It would be $12 million for the
current season, but that's based on an 82-game schedule.)
The key points the league gets across to the players is
that a.) there will not be a hard salary cap; b.) the Bird
Exception will remain; c.) the timing rules will remain;
and d.) the escrow system will be limited.
The first is an affirmation that teams will again be
allowed to go over the cap, while the owners' initial
proposal of eliminating the Bird rule was seen by the
union as a deal breaker.
In the so-called timing issue, the league originally
sought to prevent teams from signing free agents before
addressing their own free agents and going over the cap to
keep them. It has backed off that concept.
On point four, the NBA is no longer seeking an unlimited
amount to be withheld from player contracts and paid back
to teams if the overall percentage paid in salaries
exceeds the agreed-to figure.
The operative question now is whether the union's rank and
file, knowing the numbers, will continue to hold out in an
effort to assure the elite players can continue to seek
even more astronomical salaries than those being offered.