Re: Stop the (reefer) madness!

[Shawn Roth <ufpdev!shawnr@uunet.uu.net>]

Peter,

  I don't call Pippen a "loser" because of his record.  Find me one place
  during that Jordenless season where he stepped up and won a game for that
  team.  I'm sure I can point places when he, oh I don't know, refused to go
  into the game for the last few seconds, or missed a shot a team leader has to
  hit.  Anyway, I do agree with one thing this isn't the Celtics Drug
  Roundtable, but if you don't if you don't want to read the posts about the
  drug topic, then just delete the messages. 

  I did hear another B-ball related note this morning.  It sounds like the
  hearings about paying guarented contracts during the lockout could be going
  the owners way.  A clause in Olden Polynice (sp?) contract denies him pay
  during a lockout.  I'm not exactly sure the whole story, but it sounded like
  a small victory for the owners.  So it sounds like the lockout may continue.

  Well, everybody have a good day!

Shawn

Originally from Peter Delevett:
> 
> OK, please, puh-LEEZE, enough is enough. Can we agree to, say, a 10-day moratorium on the drug testing issue? This is not the Celtics Drug Roundtable. This thread has become infinitely more annoying than a Noah/Greg flame war or even the "Boo Channel 68" > thread that seemed to run on forever and ever. If you wanna debate Nancy Reagan all day long, please do it amongst yourselves. Hey Warwick -- let's hear more about that fascinating Travis/Pierce for Lorenzen/Piatkowski idea! Why would it work? Hey Shawn -> - be careful before you say Pippen was a "loser" without Jordan; as I recall, the Bullies went 55-27 and lost to the Knicks in Game 7 of the conference semis the year Jordan was shagging flies. Listen people, just because we have a lockout doesn't mean we>  can't bandy around stupid trade ideas -- it's not like our theories would be any more relevant if the lockout wasn't in place!
> 
> 
> 
>