Re: RP on Barros

[ramani_rite@lnmta.bentley.edu]

Can we compare the stats line for Tyus and Jacques Vaughn? I have a feeling
that Pitino might go after him, considering that he played in Kansas. Like
Roy Rogers and his 13 blocks vs Kentucky when Pitino was there.

Ritesh Ramani


                                                                  
 (Embedded                                                        
 image moved   Cecil Wright <cecil@hfx.andara.com>                
 to file:      04/11/98 10:02 PM                                  
 PIC20713.PCX)                                                    
                                                                  



To:   John Lyell <Jlyell@concentric.net>, Celtics@igtc.com
cc:
Subject:  Re: RP on Barros




I became interested in checking the stats of these guys:
 mpg- fga - fgm - fg% - 3pa-3pm-3p% - ft%  - apg - stl  - ppg
20.9 -471 - 202 -.429 - 106- 40  -.377 -.853 - 4.2  - 47 - 7.4
20.8 -341 - 150 -.440 -  69 - 26  -.377 -.745 - 3.9  - 72 - 5.7
21.9 -550 - 251 -.456 - 177- 72  -.407 -.866 - 3.3  - 58 - 9.0
19.9 -531 - 249 -.469 - 211- 88  -.417 -.841 - 3.4  - 74 - 9.4
If you take a look at these figures, you'll notice that nobody really seems
to standout above the others.  Though it appears that the player who
averages 20.8mpg is less of an offensive threat compared to the rest.  The
players are:
1.  Howard Eisley
2.  Derek Fisher
3.  Steve Nash
4.  Dana Barros
Dana has more steals, a much better fg%, 3p% and ppg in less minutes of
playing time than the other 3 players.  His assist ratio isn't much lower
than theirs.  The only negative for him may be that he's older and makes
more money.  But on the basis of his play, I can't see how you can say
Eisley, Nash and Fisher are *definitely* better at the point position.
The one category I have neglected is turnovers, which maybe someone else
has
the stats for.
Cecil

-----Original Message-----
From: John Lyell <Jlyell@concentric.net>
To: Celtics@igtc.COM <Celtics@igtc.COM>
Date: Saturday, April 11, 1998 2:37 PM
Subject: RE: RP on Barros

>I agree Fisher, Nash & Eisley are definitely better at the point position.
>
>
>On Friday, April 10, 1998 9:08 AM, Jeremy Warren
[SMTP:jeremy.warren@alphatech.com] wrote:
>>                       RE>RP on Barros
4/10/98
>>
>> I'll assume that he meant he wouldn't trade Dana for any other backup
point
>> guard.  But I still have to disagree.  I would rather have Howard
Eisley,
>> Derek Fisher, Steve Nash, and Eric Murdock than Dana Barros.  Is there
anyone
>> I'm forgetting?
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>> Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1998 10:54:32 -0500
>> From: Theresa Lee <tjoyce@mit.edu>
>> Subject: RP on Barros
>>
>> During the pregame show last night, Pitino talked about Dana Barros. He
>> said that is the best backup point guard in the league and he would not
>> trade him for any other point guard in the league.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>

PIC20713.PCX