Re: Why Dana?

[skmishra@dlsun660.us.oracle.com (Shailendra K. Mishra)]

Two reasons:

a) He is too expensive for a bench player.
b) He deserves a starting PG's job, I can name five teams whose starting PG's 
are worse then Dana e.g. Denver, Vancouver, Toronto, Clippers, Sacramento.
                               - Mishra
> From owner-celtics@igtc.COM Mon Apr  6 11:31:01 1998

> 
> I say we keep Dana, he will play some great minutes coming off the bench
> next season.
> 
> If we want to free some cap, lets do it with Knight, Pervis, Minor, Jones
> (both) and Tabak.
> 
> 
> Bring Mohamed!!!!!!
> 
> 
> Alejandro