Re: the sporting news article

["Mike Allen" <mallen@worldchat.com>]

I can't see Allen & Baker for Billups & Walker, this move would be useless.
 It has been repeatedly stressed by Pitino that Walker is the Celt's
building 
building block.  He has a very versatile and hard working game and is
definete future all-star.  Why give up Billups?  He was the best point
guard in the draft and by attaining Allen the Celt's are acquiring someone
who's gonna want/be worth big money when he's a free agent in 2 years.  I
don't see the Celt's making any moves with Mercer & Billups and definetly
not Walker.  However, they will most likely acquire Baker after this year
when he's a free agent.  My guess, a 1-3 million one year deal, with
promises of huge money if the Celt's achieve.

- -Mike
- ----------
> From: JLyell <jlyell@concentric.net>
> To: celtics@igtc.COM
> Subject: Re: the sporting news article
> Date: Friday, September 05, 1997 8:59 PM
> 
> 
> > 
> > > To continue someone else's argument, didn't Greg Minor miss half of a
> summer team game once? 
> >  
> > But who is going to take Greg Minor? so RP can fine him for coming
late,
> missing games but other than that he can't do a thing. - Mishra
> 
> 
> If Milwaukee moves Douglas for Dennis Scott could Billups & Walker for
> Baker & Ray Allen be a possibility ?  This would seem to address
> Milwaukee's needs but would leave the Celtic's with Edney at the point
> which I don't like.
>