Re: potential trades

["Jeremy P. Ryan" <jeryan@mailbox.syr.edu>]

I think we should all be more objective in coming up with potential trades
for the Celtics. I've seen many times where someone has this great idea
that works well for the C's but is terrible for the other team. I know we
are all Boston fans, but a majority of trade possibilities mentioned would
never go down simply because they don't help both sides. We should all
think of that when coming up with these deals on our own.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  Jeremy P. Ryan
  jeryan@mailbox.syr.edu

  Boston Celtics -- 16 NBA World Championships
  Syracuse Orangemen -- 1996 NCAA Final Four
  New York Yankees -- 1996 World Series Champions =20

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 1997 01:15:17 +1000
> From: Warwick Janetzki <giants@icplus.net.au>
> Subject: Jones / Thomas / Barros and a 2nd rounder for Robinson (Glenn)
>=20
> how bout it?
>=20
> Simon
> MZ=90

For example, why would the Bucks do this? They just traded Baker away and
gained Brandon, making Terrell the starting point g and Robinson the focus
of the offense. Besides that, I think it is clear that Walker's best
position is small forward and that is what Robinson plays. It would hurt
the Bucks and just confuse the Celtics.

P.S.--I'm not picking on you, this just illustrates my point. I would be
      happy to discuss it further.