Re: Mercer

["JLyell" <jlyell@concentric.net>]

This makes sense, but he would fit nicely at 2 for Vancouver, with Rahim at
3 & Reeves in the post.  But they may go for Van Horn, Foyle, or Battie ?

- ----------
> From: JOzersky@aol.com
> To: gkir@tjc.tyler.cc.tx.us
> Cc: celtics@igtc.com
> Subject: Re: Mercer
> Date: Thursday, March 13, 1997 11:07 AM
> 
> I agree with Gene.  If we miss out on Duncan, take Mercer, and we can get
> either Battie or Foyle with the latter pick.  No?