Re: Duncan (What else?)

[m.j.gill@uea.ac.uk (Matthew Gill)]

On Thu, 6 Mar 1997 17:33:08 -0500 (EST), you wrote:
>1. It is a lottery drawing meaning that all 14 teams without playoff
>berths get a shot. It's conceivable a team just missing the playoffs
>like Indiana or Washington could get it although their chances aren't as
>good. Case in point: Toronto won the lottery last year and they were the
>third worst team. They couldn't get the pick because they were an
>expansion team so it went to Philadelphia (the team with the worst
>record--Vancouver, the second worst team got the third pick.)

Or you could look at this from the other side, if SA have a worse
record than us, we can still win the lottery.

>4. Duncan could be one of those arrogant bastards (ala Kobe Bryant, that
>little SOB) and REFUSE, that's right REFUSE, to play for a market like
>Boston. Maybe he like so many others will not want to work with M.L.
>(More Losses) Carr or 0-the century FG shooting Todd Day. He is used
>with playing with winners and not a bunch of overpaid chronically
>injured losers (with the exception of the three W's and maybe Fox)


=46rom what I hear Duncan is not that sort of person at all.  Duncan is
the sort of person who stays in school, and works hard every night
he's on court even though he could be earning millions right now in
the NBA.

He is also not arrogant like Kobe, instead he is much more modest.
He's less flashy but has a great work ethic and it would be a great
loss if the Celtics don't get a chance to pick him.

Mat.
**********************************************
*   -----=3D=3D=3D=3D<<< Matthew Gill >>>=3D=3D=3D=3D-----   *
*   Undergraduate of Electronic Engineering  *
*   at the University of East Anglia (UEA)   *
*          email : m.j.gill@uea.ac.uk        *
**********************************************