Re: race for duncan

["David Gamble" <ope@pemberton.magnolia.net>]

We're #1!!!
We're #1!!!
We're #1!!!
We're #1!!!
We're #1!!!

- ----------
> From: Glenn Han <c987587@hc1424.mdc.com>
> To: boston celtics <celtics@igtc.com>
> Subject: race for duncan
> Date: Wednesday, March 05, 1997 5:39 PM
> 
> Thanks everyone for pointing out that Vancouver doesn't have a 
> chance for the number 1 overall pick.  This is what we are looking
> at today:
> 
> 1  BOSTON          12   47   .203 
> 2 *VANCOUVER       11   50   .180 
> 3  SAN ANTONIO     13   45   .224
> 4  PHILADELPHIA    15   43   .259
> 5  NEW JERSEY      17   41   .293 
> 6  DENVER          18   41   .305
> 7  DALLAS          19   38   .333
> 8  TORONTO         20   38   .345
> 9  GOLDEN STATE    21   36   .368
> 10 PHOENIX         22   36   .379
> 
> We have a two game lead on the Spurs.  I wonder how much ML is talking
> to San Antonio?  SA already has Robinson and unlike others, I believe
> Duncan will make a better center than a power forward.  He will hopefully
> be in the mold of Robinson, Olajuwan and Mourning.
> 
> Right now it looks like Boston gets #1, maybe #3.  And number 5-8.
> Not bad.  Considering we have Radja, Minor, Barros, Brown that are
> decent players or at least tradeable I think we will improve by
> 20 games next year.
> 
> --
> 
> -----glenn han
>      McDonnell Douglas C17 - Long Beach, CA
>      email:  c987587@hs1004.mdc.com
> 
> The "worst analogies ever written in a high school essay" 
> contest:
> 
> -The little boat gently drifted across the pond exactly the 
>  way a bowling ball wouldn't. (Russell Beland, Springfield)
> 
> -The red brick wall was the color of a brick-red Crayola crayon.