Re: Antoine

[J Rogy <birdrogy@ix.netcom.com>]

Marc Lamphier wrote:
> 
> >One thing to keep in mind is that 6'10" isn't as small as we seem to think.
> > Russell was 6'10", Hakeem and Mourning are both 6'10".  The problem isn't
> >their heights it's their weights.  But I say if the Celts are going to be a
> >quick running team then we don't want behemoths.  And if you notice, Hakeem
> >never seems to have trouble with Shaq types.
> 
> Hakeem is pretty special though, not your typical 6'10". BTW I have also
> seen Hakeem listed at 7'0". I find the latter more believable. Is Hakeem
> really only one inch* taller than Bird? I find it hard to believe.
> 
> -Marc
> 
> *one inch =   [             ]
If Hakeem is 6'10" than Duncan must be 6'6"!