[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Rick Fox
- Subject: Rick Fox
- From: jmc@ptc.com (Jonathan McIntyre)
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 1997 12:26:32 -0400
Hello everyone,
Though I've been on this list a few weeks this is my first post, even
though I've seen a lot I've wanted to respond to about various players and
coaches and very vocal scouts. I've just been extremely busy lately.
Overall, I'm very impressed with the level of discussion and informed
opinions on this list.
There's just one thing that I've seen mentioned by several people
that has bothered me more than anything else, and that's all the
mention of Rick Fox as a "bench player at best", or 6th best, or not
that great. The only way I think this could be explained is that you're
only looking at his offensive stats, and not his overall impact to the
team's winning.
Most people don't give enough credit to defense, which is at least as
important as offense in helping a team win consistently. Rick Fox is one
of the best defensive players in the league. He was excellent defensively
right from his rookie season, and he's improved significantly both
defensively and offensively since then. He's always had an uncanny ability
to strip the ball from a player just as they bring it up for a shot, and
he moves his feet as well as anyone. Last summer he used videotape to
figure out opponents' moves, and team plays, so that he could get more
steals, and this year he broke the team record in steals. Grant Hill
has been quoted saying Rick Fox is one of the 2 toughest people in the
league for him to score against.
Fox and David Wesley are the only good defenders on the worst
defensive team in the league. If you're trying to improve your
defense, you don't put your defensive star on the bench or trade him
away. The Celtics would be foolish not to re-sign Rick Fox.
He's also no slouch offensively, either, and can adapt his game to do
whatever the team needs most on a given night. When the scorers were all
injured for several games this year, he scored 30+ per night. When the
rebounders are out, he rebounds. He was 2nd on the team in rebounds and
assists, 3rd in points, blocks, FG% & FT%, and 1st in steals and 3-point FG%.
Granted, there weren't a lot of other great players on the team to compete
with, but my point is he can do everything well, and he's a defensive star,
so I think he's easily the most valuable person on the Celtics as far as
helping them toward wins.
If you want to get rid of someone, make it Dana Barros. While David Wesley
makes up for his lack of height defensively with aggressiveness and steaks,
Dana does not. Dana is a defensive liability. Offensively, he's a
great shooter, but he doesn't use that skill to help the team win. He's in
love with the 3-point shot, and consistently passes up high-percentage
short jumpers and layup opportunities for himself coming off picks or
teammates on the fast break by pulling up for 3-pointers. He sometimes
creates offensive momentum, but more often destroys it. He is the most
highly overpaid person on the team.
OK, 'nuff said. Glad I got all that off my chest! :-)
Jon McIntyre