[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) responds to Pete interview

To: <thewho@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) responds to Pete interview
From: "Scott Schrade" <schrade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 13:16:31 -0500
References: <000901c3d2eb$d8a6bf60$0700000a@Dell8250>
Reply-to: thewho@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-thewho@xxxxxxxx

>  Interesting how Mr. Darlington feels compelled to clarify when Pete contacted 
> them in relation to when the public was made aware of Operation Ore.
> 
> And, what are the "appropriate conclusions" we should now be able to draw?


Obviously it's the IWF's not-so-subtle way of insinuating that Pete attempted to
"cover his ass" once he found out there was an investigation going on.

- SCHRADE in Akron

The Council For Secular Humanism
http://www.secularhumanism.org/

References:
- Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) responds to Pete interview
  - From: Kevin O'Neal

Prev by Date: [no subject]
Next by Date: Re: Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) responds to Pete interview
Previous by thread: Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) responds to Pete interview
Next by thread: Re: Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) responds to Pete interview
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread