[no subject]

>But, I find it hard to believe that Pete didn't think he was breaking the
>law, if his legal council had already told him to not contact the Police
>after his *first* accidental viewing.  Let alone going back 3 more times,
>and those times not by accident, and then actually paying on the last.
>So, for Pete to write this is contradictory, and yet another cause for my
>disappointment.
>
> >I just think all the implications of this have been there right from the
>beginning. When I decided I was going to support Pete, then I accepted all
>the possibilities. >Since I saw that article last winter, I've been 
>thinking
>he paid to get in.
>
>Things have been progressing.
>
> >We have to go with how we feel on this.
>
>That's true, but that doesn't mean one should post things like all clear in
>the US, when article after article is being printed, for millions to read,
>that clearly is taking Pete to task.
>
> > "A Different Bomb" is very emotional, and that indicates he really wants
>to affect people and draw some attention to the problem.
>
>Despite the fact that "A Different Bomb" was published after the fact, and
>even more importantly after Pete knew his credit card information has been
>given to the FBI and then Scotland Yard, I have never doubted what he wrote
>in that piece, or his good intentions to help victims.
>Well, to be honest, I can't help but wonder sometimes.
>If it were anyone other than Pete, ADB would be seen by us listers as a
>blatant cover-up.  *That's* one of the many problems at the moment, because
>most of the world are not listers.