[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
Pete told the audience: "It's been a good evening...this is a good place to
play. And we're going to finish up tonight with...It's been long enough,
it'll keep you away from the rest room...its' a song which kind of works out
better on stage than it did on record. Before we go we'd like to remind you
of Led Zeppelin, remind you what they did to you this evening...spitting all
over the place and all that mess. Anyway, it's not meant to insult anybody.
This is 'Magic Bus'."
My Two Cents:
Recently I watched TKAA with a friend of mine who is a fan of both
bands...He'd never seen the movie and was more familiar with Zep than The
WHO. When he saw the Woodstock footage, he turned to me and said "That looks
like Plant!". I had to explain to him that it was the other way around.
I've been in many debates over the years about WHO and Zep (as I'm sure many
of you have) and I've always been a fan of both bands though I've always
known the WHO were superior in almost everyway. This is simply fact. I do
have the ability to be objective on subjects such as these. It's not just
because I personally prefer the WHO, they wrote better songs, better lyrics.
The live shows were better without fail, Zep may have made better sounding
and more consistent recordings though for me, in the end it comes down to
the fact that the entire idea for Led Zeppelin was stolen from the mind of
John Entwistle. The WHO came first (pun intended) and thats that. Zep seem
to have more commercial popularity in the US, their music is certainly more
commonly heard on the radio in my part of the country (Boston). I also am a
big fan of blues and I've always had a bee in my bonnet about the fact that
Jimmy Page and co. made a living off of stealing from Willie Dixon and
others early in their career. Page seems to think that he wrote 'Killing
Floor' for Christ's sake! The bottom line is that I don't see anyway that
Zep did anything that the WHO did'nt already do. Zep may have broken new
ground in studio production (although with uncredited help from Andy and
Glyn Johns among others) but musically and visually they did nothing that
wasn't already done by The WHO. As far as friendship goes, I know that Keith
was up on stage during 'Moby Dick' at a Zep show in L.A. I think it was in
1977-78 but I'd have to double check that. I think maybe Entiwistle may have
harbored the most resentment about it. Either way, WHO came first. As much
as I like the sound of Zep, the WHO just seemed to have more to say. Once
again, as a live act, I can't see how there is a comparison. I've heard many
boots of live Zep and they only seemed to get worse as they got older
(Knebworth for instance is pretty embarrassing, esp. when compared to the
WHO's last shows with Keith Moon) But whatever...I know that some people
prefer Zep over the WHO and thats valid...as long as they acknowledge the
fact that without the WHO there would have not been a LED ZEPPELIN. Period.
peace
Andy
"I don't talk to musicians...
they might influence me."
- Pete Townshend
Mansfield, Mass 7/26/2002
_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail