Re: Group interaction

["L. Bird" <pkeets@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> No, I was expecting you to give me enough respect to respond to some simple 
> questions that were generated by your obvious insinuations.  Hey, if you're 
> going to insinuate things, at least have the maturity to stand by them.

So are these the questions below?


> >Well, are you guys ganging up to deal with other members of the list or 
> what?
>
> But regarding this list.....when a person launches an attack on three 
> specific people, is it really such a surprise that those three people 
> respond??    You really need to part from this habit of seeing everything 
> as conspiracies.

But why did Jeff attack the three of you?  I thought he was only angry with 
Mark.

Or are you talking about me now?  I'm complaining about the crap that 
appearing on the list about Jeff.  It applies to anybody who's writing it, 
and I thought your particular post amounted to a threat.


> >Or maybe folks just get really pissed when they find out I won't fight 
> with them.
>
> Or maybe folks (like me at the moment) really don't appreciate you making 
> accusations, and implications, and then running when you're called on them. 
>  Hmmmmmmmmmmmm, who else is it that uses this sort of "hit and run" kind 
> of tactic.

I just said what I had to say.  I expect you'll have a negative response 
because it was critical, but that doesn't change what I have to say or what 
I think about the situation.  I haven't run away.  I'm just not taking a 
negotiable stand.  Why don't we discuss your post, if you're interested in a 
discussion?

Why do you feel it's appropriate to threaten Jeff on the list?  Or do you 
feel that your post wasn't a threat?


keets

_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online  
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963