[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IWF
In a message dated 1/31/03 12:17:05 PM Eastern Standard Time,
seahawkman2001@yahoo.com writes:
> In this case they come across more as hypocrites.
> They urge the public to report illegal content, but
> their actions appear to be that they may then condemn
> you publically before you are charged with a crime
> much less proven guilty. Oh, and they won't bother
> checking to corroborate your claim to have contacted
> them in good faith before they join in the press
> witch-hunt. But yes, by all means, trust us when you
> report.
>
> The really fucked-up thing about the police/press leak
> of suspects in Operation Ore, and then groups like IWF
> joining in the feeding frenzy, is that all the
> THOUSANDS of real pedophiles whose names are on the
> list are given plenty of advance warning to destroy
> their hard drives. If it all had been kept
> confidential, as I'm sure UK law proscribes, the
> authorities could have apprehended far more real
> criminals and saved far more real victims than through
> this travesty.
>
>
I really enjoyed this, Ken. Plain old common sense. That will make a great
complaint letter for when the hard evidence arrives and we attack they asses.
Jon in Mi.