[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Kevin at it again from VT
Kevin from VT writes:
> >As Kevin loves to do,
>
> Oh jeez, now I've got to reply to you....
>
> >he inserts himself into disputes between others
>
> Here is what I can proudly claim on this list, with all confidence:
>
> 1) I have *never* told anyone here what they can post about, or who they can reply to.
> IMO, if it's on the list, it's fair game. If you want to have a fight with someone and don't want people to poke fun at silly statements made in *public*, take it off list.
I also have not told that to anyone. It doesn't mean, however, that I won't call you on it when you do it. I am simply criticizing you for taking unprovoked pot shots at people who have not done so to you. I was having a legitimate political disagreement with Mark and you decided to attack me personally, for not the first time, I might add. I made no "silly" statement. I expressed joy that someone other than myself had the exact same take on Mark.
>
> 2) I have never...*ever* let my maturity or character stoop to calling people names. Unlike some repeat offenders around here.
Hmmm... what exactly is your definition of "name-calling." It must be awfully narrow if what you said about me doesn't fall into that category. Just to refresh your memory, you created a little story whereby I ran into a tree and a dog thought me so vile as to not even be worth pee-ing on. In my case, what I said about you wasn't name-calling, it was just the truth. You are what you are.
>
> >and fans the flames.
>
> I'm fanning something that smells, and it's not flames.
> Did you have beans for dinner?
Retarded attempt at humor. I actually dozed off for a second while reading it.
>
> >I thought he was filtering my posts, but apparently not.
>
> For the bazillionth time! I...am...on...digest! And, when things get busy and serious, like now, I check out the archives. Your posts recently have been quite relevant and well thought out. That's why I was reading them..lately. The name calling was quite a step back for you.
>
> Oh, and I *am* filtering out your *E-mails* to my *home* address and here at work, since you continued to subject my *family* to your rants and name calling when I repeatedly asked you to stay away. That makes you a....
> Nope, won't even do it for this, although deserved.
> You still win the prize for being the only one on all lists to have such disrespect for a persons privacy and wishes.
> Something to hang on your mantle.
Now exactly how did I subject your family to my "rants"? Do they routinely open and read your e-mails? I may have sent one e-mail to your address after you asked me not to, probably because I wasn't satisfied that our argument was concluded. I believe I apologized for it, as well. Thanks for bringing up 6 month old issues. I know everyone is fascinated by them. I haven't sent you a non-list e-mail since then.
Mc