[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Kevin at it again from VT



Kevin from VT writes:

> >As Kevin loves to do,
> 
> Oh jeez, now I've got to reply to you....
> 
> >he inserts himself into disputes between others
> 
> Here is what I can proudly claim on this list, with all confidence:
> 
> 1) I have *never* told anyone here what they can post about, or who they can reply to.
> IMO, if it's on the list, it's fair game.  If you want to have a fight with someone and don't want people to poke fun at silly statements made in *public*, take it off list.

I also have not told that to anyone.  It doesn't mean, however, that I won't call you on it when you do it.  I am simply criticizing you for taking unprovoked pot shots at people who have not done so to you.  I was having a legitimate political disagreement with Mark and you decided to attack me personally, for not the first time, I might add.  I made no "silly" statement.  I expressed joy that someone other than myself had the exact same take on Mark.  

> 
> 2) I have never...*ever* let my maturity or character stoop to calling people names.  Unlike some repeat offenders around here.

Hmmm... what exactly is your definition of "name-calling."  It must be awfully narrow if what you said about me doesn't fall into that category.  Just to refresh your memory, you created a little story whereby I ran into a tree and a dog thought me so vile as to not even be worth pee-ing on.  In my case, what I said about you wasn't name-calling, it was just the truth.  You are what you are.

> 

> >and fans the flames.
> 
> I'm fanning something that smells, and it's not flames.
> Did you have beans for dinner?

Retarded attempt at humor.  I actually dozed off for a second while reading it.

> 
> >I thought he was filtering my posts, but apparently not. 
> 
> For the bazillionth time!  I...am...on...digest!  And, when things get busy and serious, like now, I check out the archives.  Your posts recently have been quite relevant and well thought out.  That's why I was reading them..lately.   The name calling was quite a step back for you.
> 
> Oh, and I *am* filtering out your *E-mails* to my *home* address and here at work, since you continued to subject my *family* to your rants and name calling when I repeatedly asked you to stay away.  That makes you a....  
> Nope, won't even do it for this, although deserved.
> You still win the prize for being the only one on all lists to have such disrespect for a persons privacy and wishes.  
> Something to hang on your mantle.

Now exactly how did I subject your family to my "rants"?  Do they routinely open and read your e-mails?  I may have sent one e-mail to your address after you asked me not to, probably because I wasn't satisfied that our argument was concluded.  I believe I apologized for it, as well.  Thanks for bringing up 6 month old issues.  I know everyone is fascinated by them.  I haven't sent you a non-list e-mail since then.

Mc