Re: Pete in RS

["L. Bird" <pkeets@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Rolling Stone is giving credit where credit IS NOT due.  IWF has not issued 
> any such statement, they are as mum as ever on this matter. The statement 
> on their site, which Mark Stephens contradicted when he condemned Pete in 
> mulitple published remarks, has not changed since Jan. 13th.   Rolling 
> Stone simply paraphrased Matt's post on PT.Com.  Not that I don 't mind a 
> little positive spin from them, but if this is typical of how they do 
> they're reporting, then....
That's okay.  It's good points in the PR battle.  :)

And we knew all the time they weren't contenders for the Pulitzer, right?


keets

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus