[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Solo as Who

To: thewho@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Solo as Who
From: Rich <legalize@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 11:07:03 -0700
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 13 Nov 2002 12:29:11 -0500. <de.304063ab.2b03e5e7@aol.com>
Organization: multi-cellular, biological
Reply-to: thewho@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-thewho@xxxxxxxx

In article <de.304063ab.2b03e5e7@aol.com>,
    SicilianMother@aol.com  writes:

> I am not sure I agree with this...........how could [PsychoD] be a Who 
> album.........I need more details on this concept.  Help??

Well, you are of course free to disagree.

I don't think there's any "concept" here.  I'm just saying I think it
would make a good Who album.  I'm not alone in that opinion either.
-- 
Ask me about my upcoming book on Direct3D from Addison-Wesley!
  Direct3D Book <http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/>
    izfree: Open source tools for Windows Installer
            <http://izfree.sourceforge.net>

References:
- Re: Solo as Who
  - From: SicilianMother

Prev by Date: Re: Solo as Who
Next by Date: Mansfield II CD - What are The Who up to?
Previous by thread: Re: Solo as Who
Next by thread: Re: Solo as Who
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread