[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pete's uncut version of Cobain review
- To: thewho@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Pete's uncut version of Cobain review
- From: Rich <legalize@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 11:56:32 -0700
- In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 04 Nov 2002 13:16:15 -0500. <9DE44DE48562D11195EB00805FF5101B0A84FCB5@burlington13.vtmed net.org>
- Organization: multi-cellular, biological
- Reply-to: thewho@xxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-thewho@xxxxxxxx
In article <9DE44DE48562D11195EB00805FF5101B0A84FCB5@burlington13.vtmed net.org>,
"O'Neal, Kevin W." <Kevin.ONeal@vtmednet.org> writes:
> >From: Rich <legalize@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: Re: Pete's uncut version of Cobain review
> >
> >> I can't help but feel that by deleting the above, The Observer is in a
> way
> >> trying to perpetuate a generational feud between Pete and Kurt.
> >
> >...and you're just figuring that out about mass media?
>
> Huh?
> I didn't make any sort of general statement about mass media.
No, you said you felt that The Observer was trying put a nasty slant
on things.
The Observer is a newspaper, i.e. part of mass media.
This sort of behavior should not be a surprise to anyone who's been
paying attention to the evolution of mass media in the last 30-40
years.
--
Ask me about my upcoming book on Direct3D from Addison-Wesley!
Direct3D Book <http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/>
izfree: Open source tools for Windows Installer
<http://izfree.sourceforge.net>