[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
man- this just won't die (like the woman in "Misery")
In a message dated 03/19/2002 7:18:59 PM Central Standard Time,
TheWho-Digest-Owner@igtc.com writes:
> >From: Sroundtable@aol.com
> >Subject: Re:crossing the line
> >
> >I guess I should thank Jim for taking some of the heat off of me. I think
> people
> >should have stayed out of the dispute between Jeff and I, anyway. Mark,
> >Kevin, etc.
>
> Well don't you just smell like a fresh rose in Spring.
> Way to single me out after I expressed interest in meeting you at The Gorge
> (still didn't reply to my questions).
> Careful mate, the heat can come crashing back down on you mighty fast.
>
> So, kindly tell me how it is that you see me as having gotten into the
> "dispute" with you and Jeff, other than pointing out that your post was
> across the line?
> I want quotes dude. Show me. I'm serious. I'm giving you a homework
> assignment.
WOW! I figured my post was innocent enough. I actually was referring to
your "crossing the line" post. I just meant that those people who got all
offended should have relaxed and let jeff and i hash it out. It seemed like
several people felt the need to jump to jeff's defense as if he couldn't
defend himself. Kevin- you are WAY too sensitive. And by the way, it has
been YOU and jim who have kept this going- not me. However, when I am
referred to, i think it's legit to respond. Why on earth would you or mark be
offended by a simple remark that i thought ya'll should have stayed out of
the dispute? Obviously you thought you belonged involved, and that's fine.
Relax, man. I believe I did respond to ur comment about the gorge, and
expressed interest in meeting you, but i'm not sure what other questions you
aske me- but i'd be happy to respond if you would ask them again.
> >Still, none of those who said I was out of line have been able to explain
> how I was in
> >the wrong, but that's cool. I've moved on.
>
> Well since you've asked, and obviously *haven't* moved on despite everyone
> wishing you had, let me remind you of your words, since you seem to still be
> fishing for explanation...
ok- I'm not the one who keeps perpetuating this. Check the archives. I will
respond, however, when I'm mentioned in posts.
>
> >"By the way- i was not fishing for an apology, DICKHEAD,
> >i just wasn't understanding the hostility regarding a debate on the
> >legitimacy of brokers, so GO TO HELL!"
>
> Ahhhh, that's quite a hummm-dinger.
> Oooo, and let's not forget another in a series of classic Mc-Subject lines!
>
> >"OK, asshole... sorry, Jeff- what is your fucking problem? "
>
> Yes indeed-e-rhoo, that's some harmless stuff. Nothing out of line there.
> Nah. Could swear I heard the same talk at Church the other day.
Man- more hypersensitivity. LIGHTEN UP!! I never heard of a bunch of Who
fans whose favorite band cursed in a number of songs, smashed instruments,
destroyed hotel rooms and other property not their own, and did all kinds of
illegal drugs, getting so bent out of shape over a "fuck" here, or an
"asshole" there. I was angry at Jeff for his reprehensible behavior and I
think my anger was well reflected in my post. I will not apologize for the
post since I was simply reacting to attacks. The line was crossed by jeff- i
simply stayed on the other side of the line in retaliating.
>
> You know what's sad? I'm beginning to see that you are just doing this for
> attention. Bad attention is better than no attention. Isn't it Kevin?
>
> Kevin in VT
> Ready and motivated to be your huckleberry anytime you need it.
> Since you asked.
>
What's this mean? Don't know what a "huckleberry" is. I must admit- all
this attention is pretty entertaining, but I don't set out to get attention.
If I was, i never would have tried to diffuse the jeff thing off-list. Same
reason I e-mailed u privately to clear these things up. Looks like I've made
you even more angry. Sorry. It was not my intention to do so. I won't
e-mail you off-list any more.
Kevin Mc (I LOVE THIS LIST!!!!!!!)